Search This Blog

Showing posts with label Refugees. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Refugees. Show all posts

Working conditions, minimum standards and employer-provided protections in Lebanon

Case study research into Lebanese and non-Lebanese informal workers in the food and beverage industry in central Bekaa, Minieh and Akkar

 

Author: Dr. Karim El Mufti 

31 August 2018

Summary:

Many studies have investigated the crisis in livelihood, a crucial factor for the well being and dignity of displaced and refugee populations, and the lack of legal protection to which Syrian workers are subjected, especially in light of Lebanon’s crisis response plan.

This research intends to shed light on another angle to this issue, by focusing on protection-related questions within the food and beverage (F&B) industry, an increasingly informal sector due to worsening socio-economic conditions. According to the International Labor Organization, informality in the labour market is defined, “among other things, by the absence of explicit and registered work contracts and/or the absence of social security coverage for workers on the job".

The geographic scope of this research is the Bekaa and Akkar, economically underdeveloped regions that host the two largest Syrian settlements in Lebanon at 35.7% and 25.8% respectively. The study examines the employer’s role in the protection of vulnerable workers, whether Lebanese or Syrian, and relies on data collected from a survey in those two areas.

The survey encompasses 200 interviews with employees within the F&B sector (102 from Akkar and 98 from the Bekaa) generating information on the respondents’ formal status, working conditions and potential grievances. The study also relies on focus groups with local business employers in both areas.

Full study available in pdf here

Not Without Dignity: Views of Syrian Refugees in Lebanon on Displacement, Conditions of Return, and Coexistence

A Study for the International Center for Transitional Justice:

Discussions about a future return of refugees and coexistence among groups currently at war in Syria must begin now, even in the face of ongoing violence and displacement. This report, based on interviews with refugees, makes it clear that the restoration of dignity will be important to creating the necessary conditions for return and peaceful coexistence — and building a stable post-war Syria one day.

Download the full report in English here.
Download the executive summary in Arabic here.

June 12th, 2017

Armed conflict in Syria has displaced millions of people inside and outside of the country. When a political settlement to the conflict is eventually reached, the process of refugees returning to Syria and rebuilding their lives, relationships, and communities will be long and complex. However, discussions with displaced persons about return and coexistence can begin now, even in the face of ongoing violence and displacement.

This research report is based on interviews with refugees living in Lebanon and representatives of local and international organizations in both Lebanon and Turkey working on issues related to Syrian displacement. The report provides an important window into the experiences of refugees in Lebanon as well as their concerns, expectations, and priorities regarding conditions of return and coexistence.
The research findings highlight the harms experienced by Syrian refugees at both the individual and collective levels, including the loss of loved ones, houses, property, and businesses in Syria and difficult economic situations and discrimination in Lebanon. Displacement has had devastating impacts on families and led to broad social fragmentation, including sectarian and political divisions and rifts between those who left Syria and those who remained. The effects of conflict and displacement will be generational, as refugee children have been traumatized by their exposure to violence and largely deprived of education.

The findings also capture common priorities among Syrian refugees in Lebanon for return. Most do want to return, not just to Syria but to the regions and communities where they previously lived. Common preconditions for return include safety and security; shelter, livelihoods, and the physical reconstruction of homes and infrastructure; compensation or restitution for the loss of property and housing; the provision of education for children and youth; psychosocial support; and family reunification.

One positive development among refugees in Lebanon is that many youth engaged with local and international civil society organizations have acquired new skills and an openness to people with different religious and political beliefs that one day may contribute to rebuilding relationships in Syria.

Views about the potential for coexistence and justice vary widely. Some refugees believe that Syrians will be ready to rebuild ties once the conflict ends, while others are less optimistic. Some believe that justice is necessary for return, while others think it unlikely to occur. The research makes it clear that the restoration of dignity will play an important role in establishing the necessary conditions for refugee return and coexistence.
While return will ultimately depend on a political resolution to the Syrian conflict, several steps can be taken now that are likely to have implications for return and coexistence in the future. These include:
  • Integrate the views of refugees into discussions and policies about conditions of return, as participatory processes are more likely to lead to context-specific interventions.
  • Support community-level interventions, like the provision of psychosocial support, that can be implemented now and may facilitate return and coexistence in the future.
  • Address sexual and gender-based violence, women’s exploitation, and child marriage by empowering women, educating young girls, and raising awareness of such abuses among families.
  • Provide educational support to minimize the risk of the next generation being characterized by missed schooling, trauma, and violence.
  • Integrate property and land restitution into discussions of displacement settlement processes in the interest of future social cohesion.
  • Promote interaction between different groups and communities to reduce and prevent further sectarian and political divisions.
  • Support further research on Syrian refugee experiences and views on return and coexistence in countries such as Turkey and Jordan as well as in Europe.

Legal Field Study: A Survey of Court Cases against Syrian Nationals in Lebanon for Criminal Matters

ACCESS TO JUSTICE FOR SYRIAN REFUGEES IN LEBANON

 

Centre International des Sciences de l'Homme (CISH-UNESCO)




Karim El Mufti 





November 2015


 
Rationale

With the outbreak of war in neighbouring Syria, Lebanon is hosting a growing Syrian refugee population (estimated today at 1.1 million). Struggling between its international obligations under humanitarian principles and security and terrorism concerns, the Lebanese government has sent mixed signals as to how to deal with the Syrian refugees (displaced as per the official rhetoric). As a result, the Syrian refugee population in Lebanon is vulnerable and has difficulties accessing basic elements of justice.

International Alert, the Lebanese American University and the International Centre For Human Sciences (CISH) in Byblos has joined efforts under a NWO-WOTRO grant for Science for Global Development on Embedding Justice in Power and Politics (Netherlands) to further study the Access to Justice of Syrian refugees in Lebanon. Using quantitative data extracted from a selection of Lebanese Courts’ decisions, this paper aims to identify the professional trend of the Lebanese Judiciary towards Syrian defendants in conflict with the Lebanese law.

Methodology

Between February and June 2015, the author and his team worked on collecting lawsuits details of criminal type, involving Syrian nationals living in Lebanon (either as plaintiff or defendant) from three specific Court jurisdictions in Lebanon: Beirut Registry; Zahle Registry; Tripoli Registry, each in one of its chambers. The data collected form the sample used in this study and offer an important overview of the different elements of the cases such as: nationality of plaintiff/defendant and gender; date of arrest; list of charges; date of first judicial hearing; nature of court’s jurisdiction; name of the sitting judge and status of lawsuit, whether it ended, and if so if the plaintiff was convicted or released. 
The dates of these court cases stretch from June 2011 to April 2015 (based on date of arrest of the defendant). The latest court decision in this survey is dated 30 May 2015.

Out of the three geographically different registries in Beirut, Zahle and Tripoli, a total of 807 lawsuits were identified involving a Syrian national as a defendant, in addition to lawsuits where both plaintiffs and defendants were Syrians.

The study of this large sample of cases is deemed useful to identify a number of items that interest the larger research of the consortium, such as:
-       Nature of most common charges filed against Syrian nationals in Lebanon since the start of the crisis in Syria.
-       Outcome of these lawsuits as to the ability of Syrian nationals to acquire a solid judicial defence.
-       The sentencing policy of the Lebanese judiciary in these cases when it comes to Syrian nationals.

Full study available on this link.

Official response to the Syrian refugee crisis in Lebanon, the disastrous policy of no-policy

by Dr. Karim El Mufti
University Professor, expert in International Human Rights and Humanitarian Law & Social Entrepreneur

According to UNHCR, “over 2 million people have fled Syria since the beginning of the conflict in 2011, making this one of the largest refugee exoduses in recent history with no end yet in sight. The refugee population in the region could reach over 4 million by the end of 2014”. In Lebanon, UNHCR recorded 858.641 refugees by 31st December 2013, and some media reports skyrocket the number through the roof claiming that more than a million refugees are already living in the country. This short paper offers an insight on how the Lebanese authorities reacted to this humanitarian crisis, and points out the (absence of) policy from the relevant decision makers.

The paper was published on Daleel-Madani.org on 10 January 2014, click here to read.